Syndication

Operating a syndication after the raise

Once the money is in, the operating agreement is the only thing between the investors and a sponsor who has changed his mind. Control, capital, voting, and the rights that turn out to be worthless.

The raise closes and the relationship inverts. Before the wire, the investor has all the leverage and the sponsor is selling. After the wire, the sponsor has the money and the control, and the operating agreement is the only thing the investor has left. Most investors read it for the first time when something has already gone wrong.

Most passive investors discover their voting rights are worthless the first time they try to use them.

The reason is a seam between three clauses that get read separately and operate together. Manager authority defines what the sponsor can do without asking. LP voting rights define what needs a vote. Amendment rights define who can change the document those first two live in. A sponsor who controls amendments can, over time, rewrite the deal the investors thought they voted for, and a removal right set at a threshold the investors can never assemble is a right on paper and a nullity in practice. The number that matters is not whether investors can vote. It is what percentage is required, and whether the people who could reach it are ever in the same room.

Capital calls sit in the same place. An agreement that lets the manager call more money, and dilutes or penalizes anyone who cannot fund, hands the sponsor a tool that can wipe out a non-participating investor’s position without buying it.

The articles below cover manager authority, the voting and consent thresholds, amendment and removal rights, information rights, and the full capital-call machinery that decides what happens when the deal needs more money.

Inside this hub

Manager authority and major decisions

The operating agreement draws a line between what the sponsor can do alone and what needs your consent. Everything on the sponsor's side of that line, the sponsor does without asking. The whole governance fight is over where the line sits, and the two decisions that matter most, selling and refinancing, are the ones sponsors most want on their side of it.

LP voting rights and consent thresholds

A consent right is only as strong as the threshold behind it. 'Majority of the interests' can mean the sponsor's own stake plus a few friendly investors decide everything. Who counts, what fraction is required, and whether the sponsor's own interest votes are the details that turn a voting right into either a real check or a rubber stamp.

Removing the sponsor

This is the nuclear option, and whether it works decides everything. A removal right can be written to be real or to be theater. The definition of 'cause,' the cure period, the vote threshold, and what happens to the sponsor's promote on the way out are where a genuine remedy becomes an empty clause the sponsor drafted to be unusable.

Amendment rights

You read the operating agreement, understood the terms, and invested. Then the sponsor changes the terms. Whether it can do that, unilaterally, without your consent, is the amendment clause, and a broad unilateral amendment right quietly undoes every other protection in the document, because a term the sponsor can rewrite alone is not a protection at all.

Information and reporting rights

Every other protection in the agreement depends on this one, because you cannot act on a problem you cannot see. Weak information rights mean the sponsor decides what you learn and when, which quietly disables your consent rights and your removal right: you cannot vote against a decision or fire a sponsor for misconduct you were never shown.

Capital calls and what happens if you can't fund

You invested $100,000 believing that was your maximum exposure. Two years in, the sponsor demands more money or your ownership gets slashed. The capital call is the clause that turns a fixed investment into an open-ended one, and the 2023 to 2024 wave of them showed exactly how much damage the penalty terms can do to an investor who cannot or will not pay.

Dilution and default penalties

When an investor cannot meet a capital call, the operating agreement decides what happens, and the range runs from a fair fractional dilution to losing nearly everything. Cram-downs, forced transfers, and penalty multiples are the harshest tools in the document, and they exist because a sponsor and its lender want investors too afraid of the penalty to ever decline.

Additional-capital rights and pay-to-play

When a deal needs more equity, who gets to provide it? If the sponsor can bring in outside money or its own affiliate on preferred terms, existing investors get diluted by newcomers who jump ahead of them. Preemptive rights let you protect your position by funding first, and pay-to-play makes funding the price of keeping the rights you already have.

Reserves and the capital account

Two accounting concepts that decide real outcomes. Reserves are the cash cushion that prevents a capital call in the first place, so a deal with thin reserves is a capital call waiting to happen. Your capital account is the ledger tracking what you put in and take out, and it determines what you are actually owed when the deal ends.

From signed to closed: the acquisition itself

Between a signed purchase contract and owning the building sits a closing process where deals still die: the due-diligence period, the financing contingency, and the earnest money at risk. What the sponsor is actually doing in that window, and where the investor's capital is exposed.

The first 100 days after acquisition

The business plan is a document until the sponsor takes over the property, and the opening months decide whether it becomes real. What has to happen fast, why the early period is where value-add deals are won or lost, and what an investor should watch for in the first reports.

Property management versus asset management: two different jobs

Investors often assume the sponsor runs the building. Usually they don't, and shouldn't. The distinction between managing the property day to day and managing the investment strategically decides what the sponsor is actually being paid for, and where a fee can hide a conflict.

This is all free.

For anything involving the filing or management of your LLC, I'm your LLC guy.

If you need help with structuring a syndication deal, you don't have to figure out who to call. Start with me. I'll understand what you need, and with my gigantic Rolodex, I can put you in touch with the right specialist for you.

Email Tzvi

Keep reading

Syndication 68 Mistake, negligence, fraud, conflict: the gradient that decides everything When a sponsor gets it wrong, the single most important question is which kind of wrong it was, because the operating agreement protects some of them completely and none of the others. The four points on the gradient, and where the line of liability sits.

All Syndication guides